It’s safe to say that people in the liberty movement are fans of alternate school choices—the farther distance from government involvement the better. Private schools may be a good fit for some families, but they are still subject to the same government standards as public schools. Charter schools have this same requirement in most regions, but are an appealing option because they give you funding for your educational needs. While this funding does come from the government through the charter, one could easily view it as a personal tax rebate. Although charters do give you a bit more freedom of choice than public or private schools, the option that is most customizable is homeschooling. (Look up your local homeschool laws here.) Unschooling and voluntaryism are a perfect match. Unschooling—one of the many ways to homeschool—is most in line with voluntaryist philosophy and will help you teach your children by personal example how to live a life fully rooted in consent-based interactions.
Just as consent is central to voluntaryist philosophy, the same is true of unschooling. Unschooling is interest-based and child-led. While not being permissive or neglectful, parents allow their children the freedom to decide what to study and when. Subjects are learned holistically instead of being artificially separated. Emphasis is placed on helping children develop a lifelong love of learning by making it a natural, unforced part of the family culture. For example, simply by reading aloud to your children often and keeping plenty of interesting reading material handy, children even learn how to read on their own—no phonics books, no sight-word drills, no setting timers for forced daily reading practice. Instead, they get the satisfaction of accomplishing this themselves and the natural pleasure derived from reading what you like when you like.
Reading is perhaps the most common educational concern parents have for their children no matter what method of schooling they choose. Because of the very strict government expectations for reading levels at government schools, many parents struggle with the thought of giving their children this much freedom. It is my belief, however, that following the government’s lead on when and how to teach reading—the way most parents are now used to being the one and only process—poses far greater risks. When children are forced to learn something, they naturally resist, and it could cause an early and lasting dislike for reading. Additionally, government schools tend to push reading earlier than when many children have the brain development needed for decoding the printed word—again, causing unnecessary frustration for parents and children alike. This earlier push for reading also encroaches on children’s free play time, which is the best and easiest way for children to learn many things and should be tampered with as little as possible. In this way, the unschooling way of learning how to read follows the child’s natural course of development.
In John Holt’s famous work How Children Learn, he was one of the first teachers to study the natural language development in children from infancy. He makes the connection that if spoken language were broken down into bits and taught to children in the same way that reading is, a natural process would become an extremely difficult one. He hypothesized that if reading were allowed to be learned holistically the same way children learn how to speak, the process would be far easier and more rewarding for children. He also observed that children are naturally self-correcting, so if parents will take a step back and allow them more freedom to make mistakes on their journey to literacy, they will be able to manage most of the difficulties on their own. More recent studies have shown that whether a child is an early reader or later reader (even up to age 14 being in the normal range) makes no difference in their overall proficiency.
The next most common concern parents have with unschooling is that their children won’t choose to learn what the parents want them to learn, or what parents think they need to learn. As Connor Boyack explains in his book Passion-Driven Education, not all children need to learn the same things. In this book he offers great ideas for changing your expectations, thinking outside the box of standardized government schooling, and making life an educational journey. Children develop in different ways at different times from each other, making it futile to standardize their educational experiences. Even within the same families, what works for one child may not necessarily work for their siblings.
If voluntaryist philosophy is important to your family, unschooling your children is the best way to live those values consistently. By giving your children appropriate freedom of choice and becoming their educational facilitators instead of their masters, you demonstrate to them that consent is important in all facets of life and in every kind of relationship—not just our relationship to government. And speaking of government, what better way to put more distance between their constant interference and your family?